Skip to main content
· 4/15/1853

Ramsay v. Chandler

Citations

  • 3 Cal. 90

Syllabus

<p>Where a nuisance, by overflowing plaintiffs’ mining claim by means of a dam erected by defendants, was found, the decree should have ordered such a reduction of the dam as would have prevented any overflow, from that cause, of the plaintiffs’ ground ; or, if necessary, an entire abatement.</p> <p>And a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from raising their dam higher than the point designated was allowed.</p>

Judges: Heydenfeldt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.