Ramos v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The adversary system has served the administration of justice long and well. . . . The Anders compromise with our traditional adversary process has failed to justify itself.” (quoting Gale v. United States, 429 A.2d 177, 183 (D.C. 1981) (Ferren, J., dissenting))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A.C. v. Cabinet for Health & Family Services
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-02-24· cited 44×
• In Re Bailey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-12-24· cited 17×
• In re Richard A.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-18· cited 14×
• State v. Upkins (Slip Opinion)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-10· cited 7×
• Murrell v. People
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2010-04-21· cited 4×
• Roger N. Rosier v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• State v. McKenney
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1977-09-22· cited 32×
• Sanchez v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1969-02-18· cited 32×
• State v. Cigic
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-03-18· cited 25×
• Gale v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-03-19· cited 17×