Ramos v. New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under the \stream of commerce\ theory, courts must focus on the acts of the non-resident defendant to see if the defendant has a \substantial connection\ with the forum state to support an assertion of personal jurisdiction
• “The knowledge that the major impact of the injury would be felt in the forum State constitutes a purposeful contact or substantial connection whereby the intentional tortfeasor could reasonably expect to be haled into the forum State’s courts to defend his actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).