Ramos v. Mast

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]ppellant’s complaint did not set forth sufficient allegations regarding the bar proceedings to enable the trial judge to address the merits of the collateral estop-pel defense asserted in appellees’ motion to dismiss.”
• “Although res judicata and collateral estoppel are affirmative defenses which cannot ordinarily be raised by motion to dismiss, an exception is made when the face of the complaint is sufficient to demonstrate the existence of the defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).