Ramos v. City of Peru

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding City entitled to section 2-107 immunity and dismissing claims of false light invasion of privacy and personal injury
• dismissing defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and personal injury claims against a city because they were barred by section 2-107
• dismissing, among other things, a false light invasion of privacy claim against a city because it was barred by section 2-107
• dismissing defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and personal injury claims against a city because they were barred by section 2-107
• dismissing, among other claims, a defamation claim against a city because it was barred by section 2-107
• dismissing a defamation claim against a municipality, reasoning that the claim was barred by section 2-107

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).