Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that indemnification applies to principal and agent but not vendor and vendee
• stating that “cogent argument” can be made that contract created special relationship
• applying the principle in construing an indemnity contract in the context of a workers' compensation case
• noting in dicta that 2A: 15-5.2 is restricted to parties to the action
• New Jersey’s workers’ compensation act did not preclude an employer from assuming a contractual duty to indemnify a third party
• “[0]ne who in good faith and at the direction of another commits a tort is allowed indemnity against the person who caused him to act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).