Ramos v. Baldor Specialty Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “question of how [Plaintiff] spent [his] working time ... is a question of fact.”
• stating that the broad purpose of the executive exemption is “to distinguish managerial employees from non-managerial employees”
• discussing only FLSA exemptions and not engaging in a separate analysis for NYLL claims because they “fail for the same reasons as the[] FLSA claims”
• stating “ ‘we will generally defer to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations so long as the interpretation is not plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the law’ ”
• discussing the non-binding but persuasive value of regulatory preambles “because it rests on a ‘body of experience and informed judgment to which courts and litigants may properly resort for guidance’”
• discussing the non-binding but persuasive value of regulatory preambles “because it rests on a ‘body of experience and informed judgment to which courts and litigants may properly resort for guidance’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).