Ramonita Santiago De Castro v. Victor Morales Medina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 19 the Supreme Court never has suggested “that the constitutional safeguards 20 accorded under the substantive component of the Due Process Clause embrace all 21 1 state-created property interests entitled to procedural due process protection”
• guoting Rivera-Gomez v. De Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir. 1988) (further internal citations omitted)
• declining to find conscience-shocking behavior where a supervisor publicly berated an employee in the presence of her students and publicly defamed her amidst her coworkers
• cautioning against allowing substantive due process to “embroil federal courts in everyday workplace disputes between employers and their employees”
• guoting Rivera-Gomez v. de Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir. 1988)
• guoting Rivera-Gomez v. de Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir. 1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).