Ramonita Cintron Perez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when “hypothetical [is] supported by substantial evidence . . . the ALJ [is] entitled to rely on the vocational expert’s testimony”
• holding “the ALJ’s 27 conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence” if an RFC is formulated without the findings of 28 a physician
• holding “the ALJ’s conclusions are not 27 supported by substantial evidence” if an RFC is formulated without the findings of a physician
• concluding there was substantial evidence when as part of the hypothetical, the hearing officer read aloud the medical expert’s findings to the vocational expert
• noting that where a hypothetical is supported by substantial evidence \the ALJ [is] entitled to rely on the vocation expert's testimony\
• holding “the ALJ’s conclusions are not 16 supported by substantial evidence” if an RFC is formulated without the findings of a physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).