Ramon Joel Pena v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he potential for unfair prejudice [is] greatly reduced where . . . the district court g[ives] a limiting instruction.”
• “This court has noted a ‘strong legislative judgment that evidence of prior sexual offenses should ordinarily be admissible.’”
• “Evidence of propensity admitted under Rules 413 and 414 is not an ‘improper basis’ upon which a jury could rely, and thus not unfairly prejudicial in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).