Ramon Haro-Arteaga v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that motions filed under § 2255 were not considered second or successive where earlier § 2255 motions were dismissed without prejudice and without substantive review
• declining to apply the second-or-successive bar because Haro-Arteaga explained that “he was making the motion [to dismiss] to ‘avoid any delay in his pending transfer application to Mexico’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).