Skip to main content
· 11/9/1896

Ramlack v. Wolf

Citations

  • 178 Pa. 356
  • 35 A. 879
  • 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1177

Syllabus

<p>Promissory notes — Accommodation indorser — Evidence — Question for jury.</p> <p>In an action by a holder of a promissory note against the first indorser, who was an accommodation indorser, it appeared that the second indorser owed the holder $1,000 on a judgment note and over $800 on book account. Both the holder and the second indorser testified that the note in suit, which was for $2,000, was given in payment of the judgment note which was surrendered, and also in payment of the book account, and that the difference making up the $2,000 was paid by the holder to the second indorser in cash. Held, that the evidence was sufficient to support a verdict and judgment against the first indorser for the full amount of the note.</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Pee, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.