Skip to main content
· 5/21/2015

Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta Lynch

Citations

  • 787 F.3d 288
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8449
  • 2015 WL 2434832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employing Skidmore analysis and finding the agency's interpretation unpersuasive \as it does not rest on thorough or valid reasoning\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Haynes, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.