Ramirez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We will not broadly construe Obergefell’s discussion of intimacy as a determination that intimacy, particularly sexual intimacy, between consenting adults is a fundamental right, as Ramirez urges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leander Independent School District v. Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-12-14
• in the Interest of J.C., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2019-08-27
• in the Interest of J.C., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2019-09-05
• Pierre Andrews v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2026-06-18

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lawrence v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
• Obergefell v. Hodges
  Supreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
• Chavez v. Martinez
  Supreme Court· 2003-05-27· cited 899×
• Ex Parte Abell
  Texas Supreme Court· 1981-03-18· cited 225×
• In Re Shaw
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-09-26· cited 61×
• Ex Parte Morales
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-07· cited 60×
• Toledo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-04-06· cited 59×
• Paschal v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2012-03-29· cited 26×
• Berkovsky v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2006-10-18· cited 2×