Ramirez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in failing to consider the merits of new claims in an amended rule 3.850 motion where the court had denied the motion in part but not entered a final order disposing of the original motion
• holding trial court erred in not considering merits of new allegations in rule 3.850 amendment, even though order denying original motion in part had been entered, where court had not entered final order disposing of original motion
• trial court should consider the merits of defendant’s pro se amended motion for postconviction relief, where the trial court had not yet made a final determination on the merits of the remaining claim, and the supplemental motion was filed within the statutory time limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McAbee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-21· cited 4×
• Sinclair v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-12· cited 2×
• Molfetto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-30· cited 1×
• CHERENFANT v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-12
• Marcus Blackmon v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-06
• Diresta v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-05
• Woldseth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• In Re Anders Briefs
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-30· cited 138×
• Gaskin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-01· cited 105×
• Beard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-07· cited 10×
• Lang v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-14· cited 7×