Skip to main content
· 12/14/2009

Ramirez v. Runnels

Citations

  • 357 F. App'x 925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that communications were privileged as a necessary incident to the statutory right and the confidence necessary in such a relationship must be preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcón, Tashima, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.