Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant did not violate CUTPA when it “availed itself of the rights afforded under the plain and unambiguous terms of [an] agreement”
• holding that a defendant did not violate CUTPA when it \availed itself of the rights afforded under the plain and unambiguous terms of [an] agreement\
• explaining that courts should not “import terms into [an] agreement ... that are not reflected in the contract” (emphasis added)
• reading “any” in conjunction with words “without limitation” in contract dispute to have expansive meaning
• reading ‘‘ ‘any’ ’’ in conjunction with words ‘‘ ‘without limitation’ ’’ in contract dispute to have expansive meaning
• “The law of contract interpretation militates against interpreting a contract in a way that renders a provision superfluous.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).