Ramirez Santos, Edmundo v. Salon De Las Estrellas Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that vocational experts have the authority to testify 2 whether a particular plaintiff would be able to perform specific jobs within DOT sub- 3 categories
• noting that “the burden of establishing preclusion is placed on the party claiming it,” id. at 517 n.6 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• defining minor disputes as “grievances that arise daily between employers and carriers regarding rates of pay, rules, and working conditions”
• declining to apply issue preclusion to findings of the PLB when the PLB “was limited to reviewing the record created in the railroad-controlled investigative hearing”
• declining to apply issue preclusion to findings of the PLB when the PLB “was limited to reviewing the record created in the railroad-controlled investigative hearing”
• reviewing factual findings 2 for substantial evidence and questions of law and application 3 of law to facts de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).