Ramirez-Salazar v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner’s speedy trial claim was waived when the petitioner entered an unconditional no contest plea because the right to a speedy trial is not a jurisdictional issue
• concluding that the petitioner’s speedy trial claim was waived when the petitioner entered an unconditional non contendere plea because the right to a speedy trial is not a jurisdictional issue
• finding a challenge to state court’s interpretation and application of its sentencing laws and guidelines to be a matter of state law not cognizable in a federal habeas corpus proceeding
• finding a challenge to state court’s interpretation and application of its sentencing laws and guidelines to be a matter of state law not cognizable in a federal habeas corpus proceeding
• “A state court’s alleged misinterpretation of state sentencing guidelines and crediting statutes is a matter of state concern only.”
• “A state court’s alleged misinterpretation of state sentencing guidelines and crediting statutes is a matter of state concern only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).