Ramírez Rodríguez v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a two month period between the alleged adverse employment action and the filling of an administrative discrimination claim did not establish a causal connection
• holding that a company’s offering of report and statements to demonstrate why employee’s practice was inconsistent with company policy was not hearsay because it “explain[ed] the basis for its decision to terminate [the employee]”
• setting forth elements of a prima facie case of retaliation under the ADEA
• \unsworn statement under penalty of perjury . . . is admissible for summary judgment purposes\
• two months was too remote
• two months was too remote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).