Ramirez Diaz, Pedro I v. First Medical Health Plan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that private persons who conspire with state officials to violate constitutional rights do not have available “the good faith immunity applicable to public officials”
• holding that private persons who conspire with state officials to violate constitutional rights do not have available \the good faith immunity applicable to public officials\
• holding that private parties invoking state garnishment or pre judgment attachment statutes later found to be unconstitutional are not entitled to qualified immunity
• holding that private parties invoking state garnishment or prejudgment attachment statutes later found to be unconstitutional are not entitled to qualified immunity
• holding that immunity unavailable to private parties responsible for invoking state replevin, garnishment, or attachment statute
• holding that \private defendants\ were not entitled to qualified immunity, but remanding for a determination of whether they were liable as government actors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).