Rambus Inc. v. Rea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board erred when it found objective evidence lacked a nexus where at least some of the evidence related to the “patented design as a whole”
• “[O]bjective evidence of nonobviousness lacks a nexus if it exclusively relates to a feature that was known in the prior art.”
• “Objective evidence of nonobviousness need only be ‘reasonably commensurate with the scope of the claims,’ and we do not require a patentee to produce objective evidence of nonobviousness for every potential embodiment of the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).