Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that analysis of Rule 803(6) and 902(11) go “hand in hand,” and identifying the following requirements for authentication under Rule 902(11):(1
• explaining that to validate a document as a business record, “the custodian or qualified witness must not only be familiar with the maintenance of the records, but also with how they are created”
• “Thus, the most appropriate way to view Rule 902(11) is as the functional equivalent of testimony offered to authenticate a business record tendered under Rule 803(6) because the declaration permitted by Rule 902(11

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).