· 12/15/1982
Ramanadham v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 455 A.2d 1134
- 188 N.J. Super. 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the jury should separately determine the damages proximately caused by a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act in a case in which plaintiffs are proceeding upon multiple theories of liability
- claims included breach of contract and violation of the Consumer Fraud Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Matthews, Antell and Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.