Skip to main content
· 12/15/1982

Ramanadham v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 455 A.2d 1134
  • 188 N.J. Super. 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the jury should separately determine the damages proximately caused by a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act in a case in which plaintiffs are proceeding upon multiple theories of liability
  • claims included breach of contract and violation of the Consumer Fraud Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Matthews, Antell and Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.