Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Sharp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the allowance or denial of punitive damages rests entirely in the discretion of the trier of fact
• implying that either a vicarious or complicity theory of principal liability was appropriate
• stating that prejudgment interest \is not designed as a penalty\
• stating that prejudgment interest \is not designed as a penalty\
• stating that prejudgment interest \is not designed as a penalty\
• “Prejudgment interest is viewed as compensation for use by defendant of money to which plaintiff is entitled .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).