· 6/18/1976
Ram Development Co. v. Shaw
Citations
- 244 N.W.2d 110
- 309 Minn. 139
- 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that it could be that “all members means all current members whether present or absent, voting or not” (emphases added)
- observing other case law, but noting that the governing statute required “two-thirds of all members”
- where the narrow issue was whether an amendment of the zoning ordinance requiring a two-thirds vote of all the members of the council was accomplished when there were four ayes, two abstentions and one pass
- involving an issue of parliamentary procedure
- involving an issue of parliamentary procedure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, MacLaughlin, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.