Skip to main content
· 6/18/1976

Ram Development Co. v. Shaw

Citations

  • 244 N.W.2d 110
  • 309 Minn. 139
  • 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that it could be that “all members means all current members whether present or absent, voting or not” (emphases added)
  • observing other case law, but noting that the governing statute required “two-thirds of all members”
  • where the narrow issue was whether an amendment of the zoning ordinance requiring a two-thirds vote of all the members of the council was accomplished when there were four ayes, two abstentions and one pass
  • involving an issue of parliamentary procedure
  • involving an issue of parliamentary procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, MacLaughlin, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.