Ralph v. Pipkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a civil action for conversion is not recognized in Tennessee for the appropriation of intangible personal property
• distinguishing between intangible intellectual property and “tangible personal property that can be seen, felt, weighed and measured”
• expressly holding that while the motion to dismiss was deficient, the court would follow the precedent set in Willis to nevertheless consider the motion
• expressly holding that while the motion to dismiss was deficient, the court would follow the precedent set in Willis to nevertheless consider the motion
• “[w]e generally will construe ambiguous terms against the drafter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).