Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a unity of interests where, in part, a parent company owned nearly all shares of a subsidiary, and all the subsidiary's officers were officers of the parent company
• “Under California law, ‘inadequate capitalization of a subsidiary may alone be a basis for holding the parent corporation liable for the acts of the subsidiary ”
• \[I]nadequate capitalization of a subsidiary may alone be a basis for holding the parent corporation liable for acts of the subsidiary.\
• language preceding a colon applies equally to the clauses that 21 follow
• “ ‘[A] corporation’s employees owe no independent fiduciary duty to a third party with whom they deal on behalf of their employer.’ ” (applying California law) (quoting Grosvenor Props. Ltd. v. Southmark Corp., 896 F.2d 1149, 1154 (9th Cir (1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).