Skip to main content
· 8/17/2000

Ralph S. Cato v. Fresno City Daryl Balch, and J. Bradin R. Matsumoto, and Michael G. Marderosian

Citations

  • 220 F.3d 1073
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 423
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6889
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9169
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20686
  • 2000 WL 1159263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that entry of subsequent 17 order fully and finally disposing of the matter “cured” the defect in counsel’s immediate 18 notice of appeal
  • holding that the court UNITED STATES V. SWENSON 11 “can assume jurisdiction based on a prematurely filed notice of appeal when ‘subsequent events can validate [the] prematurely filed appeal’” (quoting Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 630 F.2d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Rymer, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.