Ralph Larsen & Son, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of retail, rather than wholesale, value in closing argument of drug courier case was not plain error
• holding that a search conducted minutes after a defendant had crossed the border and was less than sixty feet from the border was a routine border search
• noting that defendant's question, “Do I need a lawyer” or “Do you think I need a lawyer” did not “rise to the level of even an equivocal request for an attorney”
• deeming routine a secondary search that occurred only a few minutes after the defendant had crossed the border and was less than sixty feet away
• \Do I need a lawyer?\ or \Do you think I need a lawyer?\ not even an equivocal request for a lawyer
• “Do I need a lawyer?” or “Do you think I need a lawyer?” not even an equivocal request for a lawyer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).