Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where state law issue is undecided, federal court must place itself in state supreme court's position to determine how that court likely would resolve matter
• stating that where state law issue is undecided, federal court must place itself in state supreme court’s position to determine how that court likely would resolve matter
• advising courts to \deny the motion if the evidence would allow reasonable jurors to differ as to the conclusions that could be drawn\
• finding no abuse of discretion in denial of Rule 15(b) motion to amend complaint where \the claims [the appellant] sought to add lacked substance\
• finding \the district court's denial of [the plaintiff's] motion to file a fourth amended complaint clearly placed the prima facie tort claim outside the proper considerations at trial\
• applying Hydraflow test to diversity case when there was no controlling state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).