Skip to main content
· 5/1/1991

Ralph J. Perk, Cross-Appellee v. The Reader's Digest Association, Inc., and Eugene H. Methvin, Cross-Appellants

Citations

  • 931 F.2d 408
  • 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2098
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendants were not \liable for failing to perform the thorough professional investigation [the plaintiff] would have preferred\
  • holding that the defendants were not “liable for failing to perform the thorough professional investigation [the plaintiff] would have preferred”
  • holding that the defendants were not “liable for failing to perform the thorough professional investigation [the plaintiff] would have preferred”
  • noting that a publisher has “no legal obligation to present a balanced view” in its article
  • noting that a publisher has \no legal obligation to present a balanced view\ in its article
  • noting that a publisher has “no legal obligation to present a balanced view” in its article

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Miles, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.