Ralph J. Maisano, III and Audrey D. Maisano v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this court has rejected multiple variations of the “wages are not income” argument
• recognizing that this court has rejected multiple variations of the “wages are not income” argument
• recognizing that this court has rejected multiple variations of the “wages are not income” argument
• explaining that, for sanctions purposes, a frivolous appeal is defined as one in which the end result is obvious
• noting that this court has repeatedly rejected, as frivolous, variations of the “wages are not income” argument
• awarding damages under Rule 38 against pro se litigant as sanction for frivolous appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).