Ralph Hubert Houston, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lack of specific allegations bars Reporter's Act claim in collateral proceeding
• “Manifestly, Rule 18 confers no absolute right upon the defendant but is a statutory statement of the traditional concept of ‘forum non conveniens’ relating to the appropriate forum within the district. As stated in Bostick v. United States, 400 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1968

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).