Ralph Derrico v. Sheehan Emergency Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff must set forth specific facts as to each 25 individual defendant’s causal role in the alleged violation
• noting that even though a plaintiff’s complaint stated a legal “principle without expressly identifying its provenance,” the plaintiff’s use of a certain term “left no doubt that the source was federal labor law”
• “Deference to the collective bargaining process also requires us to respect the expiration date chosen by the parties.”
• “[A]fter expiration of the CBA there is no contract subject to section 301 and there can be . . . no[] preemption under section 301.”
• the causal “inquiry . . . must be individualized to focus on the duties and responsibilities of each individual defendant.”
• “Speculative injury does not constitute irreparable injury sufficient 25 to warrant granting a preliminary injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).