Skip to main content
· 8/4/1993

Ralph Condo v. Sysco Corporation

Citations

  • 1 F.3d 599
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20104
  • 1993 WL 289851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Chevron analysis to another DOL rule interpreting FLSA's overtime provisions, 29 C.F.R. § 778.114 , finding that Congress delegated interpretive authority to the DOL, and concluding that the rule is entitled to deference
  • an agreement fixing overtime at 50% of straight time displays the re- quired “clear mutual understanding”
  • where the language of the IMWL and the FLSA are coextensive, the same analysis may be used to determine whether an overtime violation occurred
  • \The first step in determining the intent of Congress is to examine the plain language of the statute.\
  • section 207(a)(1) of the FLSA is substantially the same as section 105/4a(1) of the IMWL, and if the FLSA provision is complied with, so too is the IMWL
  • though work did not fall below 40 hours per week, Condo worked varying amounts of overtime hours and number of hours worked therefore \fluctuated\ for purposes of section 114

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Easterbrook, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.