Rallis v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that it could find constructive notice from evidence that the defendants knew of a recurring dangerous condition
• discussing the factual circumstances of previous cases and explaining that there are several ways to prove constructive notice under New Hampshire law
• discussing the factual circumstances of previous cases and explaining that there are several ways to prove constructive notice under New Hampshire law
• applying recurring condition rule under section 343
• limiting duty to “foreseeable dangers”
• limiting duty to “foreseeable dangers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).