Skip to main content
· 12/13/1960

Raleigh v. Dixie Ohio Express

Citations

  • 26 F.R.D. 624
  • 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because a client had no intent to create an Article 9 security interest when he assigned his tax refund to his attorney as payment for services, there was no requirement that the assignment be recorded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swinford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.