Ralcon, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was “beyond argument” that the contractor’s “claim for convenience termination damages ... can not survive here ... because that claim was not submitted to the contracting officer for a final decision as required by 41 U.S.C. § 605(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Ralcon, Inc. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Ralcon, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1987-08-14· cited 6×