Rakestraw v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a judgment finding a defendant in contempt should “not refer in any way to [the] defendant being‘convicted’”
• failing to reach contention that trial court plainly erred in entering conviction for contempt because “the trial court will be able to easily correct the judgment on remand so that it does not refer in any way to defendant being ‘convicted’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).