Skip to main content
· 7/28/1895

Rakes v. Rustin Land, Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 2 Va. Dec. 156
  • 22 S.E. 498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate error where the petitioner’s brief was limited to “a description of, and an argument based on, what the city did, rather than what and why LUBA was asked to and did rule about the city’s actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.