Raju J. Mukhi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing constructive discharge claim to proceed where plaintiff proffered evidence that employer’s offer of layoff with possibility of recall was illusory
• noting that the typical fourth prong of the prima facie case — that the employee was replaced by someone outside the protected class or that similarly situated employees outside the protected class were treated more favorably — is supplanted in workforce reduction cases
• detecting prima facie statistical evidence of age discrimination where termi-nees were on average seven years older than those not terminated
• finding that a constructive discharge would occur if a company coerced an employee to retire by offering him either (1) voluntary retirement with benefits, a lump sum, and retirement payments or (2) an involuntary lay off without benefits and an only illusory chance to be rehired
• finding that a constructive discharge would occur if a company coerced an employee to retire by offering him either (1) voluntary retirement with benefits, a lump sum, and retirement payments or (2) an involuntary lay off without benefits and an only illusory chance to be rehired
• “[A] constructive discharge exists if working conditions are such that a reasonable person in the plaintiff’s shoes would feel compelled to resign.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).