Skip to main content
· 4/4/1995

Rajis Ashkin v. Time Warner Cable Corporation

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 140
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 489
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7541
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,501
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 828
  • 1995 WL 144263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing fifteen days for attorney and represented party to respond concerning Rule 38 sanctions
  • \Ashkin had not in fact complained about any sexual harassment[;] her expressed objections ... were limited to his managerial style.\
  • “Ashkin had not in fact complained about any sexual harassment[;] her expressed objections ... were limited to his managerial style.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Manion, Aspen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.