Rajeshwar Singh Yadav and Roopa Yadav v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court clerk violated Rule 3(d) by failing to forward NOA to the court of appeals for nearly three months
• district court clerk violated 10 The State argues that the only external circumstances that are relevant to Rule 60(b)(6) are those that prevent the initial filing of an appeal in compliance with Rule 4(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).