Rajamin v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mortgagors lacked standing to complain of foreclosing lender's alleged violation of a securitization trust agreement
• concluding that unauthorized acts of a trustee may be ratified by the trust's beneficiaries, as such acts are \not void but merely voidable by the beneficiary\
• holding that the plaintiffs who were neither parties nor third-party beneficiaries of a pooling service agreement could not assert noncompliance with the agreement as a claim or defense
• holding that the mortgagors lacked standing to complain of violation of the securitization trust agreement, and concluding that under § 7-2.4 of New York's Estates, 4 A-0793-15T1 Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL
• holding that mortgagors A-2435-18T2 11 lacked standing to complain that the assignment of their mortgages to the defendant violated the terms of a pooling agreement in which the mortgagors' original lender was a party
• finding that borrowers have no standing to allege a defect in the assignment of their mortgage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).