Raison v. Raison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had “some basis” for making a claim, which she offered in her own testimony, and refusing to sanction her by imposing attorney’s fees
• “Judicial estoppel is properly classified as an affirmative defense, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c)(1); see also 18B Charles Alan Wright and Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 4477 (2d ed.2014
• “Given the “safe harbor” provisions, “a party cannot delay serving its Rule 11 motion until conclusion of the case.”
• “Judicial estoppel is properly classified as an affirmative defense, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c)(1); see also 18B Charles Alan Wright and Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 4477 (2d ed.2014

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).