Skip to main content
· 12/11/1974

Raishbrook v. Estate of Bayley

Citations

  • 528 P.2d 1331
  • 90 Nev. 415
  • 1974 Nev. LEXIS 412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[w]hen evidence on which a district court’s judgment rests is not properly included in the record on appeal, it is assumed that the record supports the lower court’s findings”
  • providing that this court assumes evidence omitted from the record supports the district court's judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.