Raiser v. Utah County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there 4 was no prejudice when the nonmoving party relied on the deemed 5 admissions for only a two-week period while preparing its summary 6 judgment motion
• finding that “allowing the admissions to be withdrawn would subserve the presentation of the merits of the action” where “the admissions at issue conceded the core elements of [the plaintiff]’s case”
• finding that “allowing the admissions to be withdrawn would subserve the presentation of the merits of the action” where “the admissions at issue conceded the core elements of [the plaintiff]’s case”
• finding no prejudice where party moved to withdraw admission two weeks after request and before motion for summary judgment filed
• “finding no prejudice when the nonmoving party had relied on the deemed 19 admissions for only a two-week period in preparing its summary judgment motion”
• finding no prejudice when the nonmoving party had relied on the deemed admissions for only a two-week period in preparing its summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).