Rainworks Ltd. v. Mill-Rose Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that defendants marked their products with the patent number that they were accused of infringing for a significant period of time but concluding that, in equity, the doctrine did not foreclose defendants’ defenses and non-infringement counterclaims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).