Skip to main content
· 10/6/1989

Rainwater Concrete Co. v. Cardinal Concrete Co.

Citations

  • 17 Va. Cir. 325
  • 1989 Va. Cir. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s characterization of defense’s argument as a “smoke screen” or “octopus beclouding surrounding water” was “just that: the prosecutor’s characterization of the defendant’s evidence” and not prosecutorial misconduct
  • concluding that the petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief “[b]ecause the Michigan Court of Appeals was not unreasonable in finding that the[ ] comments [challenged in his prosecutorial misconduct claim] did not render [the] trial fundamentally unfair”
  • ”Thus, as long as the last reasoned opinion of the state court . . . does not contradict clearly established federal law, habeas relief is inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.